So who was right? CM Punk or Triple H? Or were both assholes?

After listening to the Punk podcast, the WWE really comes off in a bad light. I can 100% buy in to the fact that Triple H is a master politician, following in the footsteps of his father in law. But, Punk has a reputation of being an asshole. Was anybody right? No. They were both in tough situations, and honestly they both should have worked harder to find a better solution. But instead, everybody was wrong, and everyone went the wrong way about fixing the problems. I lean more towards Punk, because I have seen a lot of instances showing that WWE executives care more about the company than the performers on their shows. But that's not to say Punk is completely innocent. I whole heartedly believe Vince and Triple H do everything they can to protect their assets, whether it's actually the right way to go about it or not. I'm more likely to believe that CM Punk is telling the truth, because he just doesn't care about what he says, than Triple H, who has an entire company to think about when he speaks. But in the end, everybody should forget the BS, man up, and put their focus where it really belongs- the fans!

ncG1vNJzZmien6fCrr%2BNsKmeq6Shsru7zZ5lnKedZMGpvsSam6xno6R6uLTOZq6aq12ntqi002aapmWgqrusec6rZK2qmaW5pnnHZqarZaeav6Z5wairoWWRqMCpu8ueqmdqaG6BdYWO